On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 01:51, Chris Kaynor <ckay...@zindagigames.com> wrote: > I am implemented a custom set-like type which interacts with some > third-party software when retrieving and mutating the set, and have derived > my custom type off of collections.MutableSet, however I have noticed that > some of the magic methods supported by the built-in set do not fully > function with my custom type. From this, I looked over the > MutableSet definition in and it seems to be missing all of the reflected > operators (__rsub__, __rand__, __ror__, __rxor__, and friends) for the > operators it has defined. I can post a simple example case if desired. > I am using Python 2.6.4 (with some in-house customizations), however a quick > look over the svn repository shown on python.org makes it appear that these > are also not implemented in Python 3. I was wondering if there is some > reason for this, or if it was merely an oversight. > Chris
See http://bugs.python.org/issue8743 and also http://bugs.python.org/issue2226 Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
