Am Monday 08 November 2010 02:26:51 schrieb Robert Kern: > On 2010-11-07 18:53 , Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > > In message<mailman.720.1289149298.2218.python-l...@python.org>, Robert > > Kern > > > > wrote: > >> Everyone here knew exactly what he meant. > > > > But if you don’t banana the right tomato, everybody could be grapefruit, > > right? > > > > You know what I mean. > > And as I reiterated in the part that you snipped, he is not using > "commercial" as a synonym for "proprietary". It is the license that he > sells commercially.
..with a pretty affordable price, I may add. I don't understand all the fuzz about some obvious formulation. It it a concern only for those who want to _sell_ their _products_ based on PyQt and consequently don't want to reveal their source code. Pete (Not being afflicted in any way with Riverbankcomputing, other than being a satisfied commercial licencee). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list