>> Given the context, "PyQt is available under the GPL and a commercial >> license," the commercial license Phil is talking about is not the >> GPL. > > Which is a wrong interpretation of “commercial”.
But he is not interpreting either “commercial” or GPL. What he says is: here's the code for free (gratis, no price) under the GPL, but if you don't like it, I also offer it commercially (under an undisclosed license, maybe a custom one as required by the client). He is NOT offering the GPL version commercially, even if that's allowed by the GPL. For ex. You are free to do it, it's that he is not doing it (or just not advertising it - I'm sure he wouldn't mind someone paying for the GPL version either). -- дамјан ((( http://damjan.softver.org.mk/ ))) "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
