On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Richard Thomas <chards...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 7, 3:11 am, "Alf P. Steinbach /Usenet" <alf.p.steinbach > +use...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Donald Knuth once remarked (I think it was him) that what matters for a > program > > is the name, and that he'd come up with a really good name, now all he'd > had to > > do was figure out what it should be all about. > > > > And so considering Sturla Molden's recent posting about unavailability of > MSVC > > 9.0 (aka Visual C++ 2008) for creating Python extensions in Windows, and > my > > unimaginative reply proposing names like "pni" and "pynacoin" for a > compiler > > independent Python native code interface, suddenly, as if out of thin > air, or > > perhaps out of fish pudding, the name "pyni" occurred to me. > > > > "pyni"! Pronounced like "tiny"! Yay! > > > > I sat down and made my first Python extension module, following the > tutorial in > > the docs. It worked! > > > > But, wait, perhaps some other extension is already named "piny"? > > > > Google. > > > > <url:http://code.google.com/p/pyni/>, "PyNI is [a] config file > reader/writer". > > > > Argh! > > > > - Alf > > > > -- > > blog at <url:http://alfps.wordpress.com> > > PyNI seems to perform the same function as ConfigParser. I prefer the > pronunciation like tiny to Py-N-I. The latter seems clunky. > > On a possibly related note I was disappointed to discover that > Python's QT bindings are called PyQT not QTPy. :-) > Isn't this the standard. Qt -> PyQt crypto -> pycrypto MT -> PyMT ..... and the list goes on and on .. :) ~l0nwlf
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list