On Jul 5, 3:42 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.
42.desthuilli...@websiteburo.invalid> wrote:
> kedra marbun a écrit :
>
>
>
> > i'm confused which part that doesn't make sense?
> > this is my 2nd attempt to py, the 1st was on april this year, it was
> > just a month, i'm afraid i haven't got the fundamentals right yet. so
> > i'm gonna lay out how i got to this conclusion, CMIIW
>
> > **explanation of feeling (0) on my 1st post**
> > to me, descriptor is a particular kind of delegation, it takes the job
> > of coding the delegation by having a contract with programmers that
> > the tree meta operations (get, set, del) on attr are delegated to the
> > obj that is bound to the attr
> > are we agree that descriptor is a kind of delegation?
>
> > the mechanism that makes descriptor works is in __getattribute__,
> > __setattr__, __delattr__ of 'object' & 'type'
>
> > now, if i want a single descriptor obj to be delegated to multiple
> > tasks, i can't do it since __get__ doesn't get info that can be used
> > to determine which task to do
> > i must have diff descriptor obj for each task
>
> > class Helper:
> > def __init__(self, name):
> > self.name = name
> > def __get__(self, ins, cls):
> > if self.name == 'task0': ...
> > elif self.name == 'task1': ...
> > else: ...
>
> Replacing such "big switch" code with polymorphic dispatch is one of the
> goals (and feature) of OO. This should be:
>
> class Task0(object):
> def __get__(self, obj, cls):
> # code here
>
> class Task1(object):
> def __get__(self, obj, cls):
> # code here
>
> class A(object):
> task0 = Task0()
> task1 = Task1()
>
> If you have common code to share between TaskO and Task1 then factor it
> out into a base class.
>
> > if __get__ receives the name, then i could do
>
> > class Helper:
> > def __get__(self, ins, cls, name):
> > ...
>
> > class a:
> > task0 = task1 = Helper()
>
> Yuck.
what's so 'Yuck' about it? ;)
i guess i need a strong stmt: is descriptor a kind of delegation? or
is it not?
* if it is a kind of delegation, then the code that you labeled as
'Yuck' is just a result of applying delegation
what's wrong with delegating multiple tasks to a single obj?
that code is similar to this
class Helper:
def do_this(self, ins): ...
def do_that(self, ins): ...
class a:
delegate = Helper()
def task0(self): self.delegate.do_that(self)
def task1(self): self.delegate.do_this(self)
the diff is that this code manually code the delegation, that's why it
can branches to 2 funcs. while descriptor takes all to __get__,
because it works on more meta lv
* if it's not, then there's nothing to be argued, the name
'descriptor' is perfectly fit: descriptor obj describes attr of class,
with 'describe' translates to: . = del, in py vocabularies. then, to
think a single descriptor obj describing a single attr is acceptable,
it's a common sense
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
