On 05/31/2010 05:13 AM, Jason D wrote: > There is however never been an issue to locate different version of python > in your system as you deem fit without problems. > So I dont understand why your concern.
Actually, replacing python on RHEL is a major endeavor. Almost all Red Hat utilities are written in python and depend on the specific system version of python that they shipped. Thus if you want to upgrade python you're going to break 80% of the system. Sure you can install Python from source alongside the system python, but that's a maintenance nightmare for system administrators. I administer some 30 RHEL instances, and compiling from source just isn't a good option here. As for third-party RPMs, that's all fine and well as long as you don't need any support from Red Hat. RH can only support software they ship and certify. As for me, I don't need RH to support my custom RPMs, so I think that's probably a fair compromise. It would be nice to have a source (that's kept up to date security-wise) of python packages that can be installed alongside RH system ones. Maybe call it python26 or python28 or python31 and stick it in the EPEL repository. I am supposing that if anyone wanted to do this, the EPEL folks would be happy to let that person be the package maintainer. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list