> > Not sure what the readability issue is. The phrase "nlargest(2, > > iterable)" does exactly what it says, finds the 2 largest elements > > from an iterable. That makes the programmer's intent more clear than > > the slower, but semanticly equivalent form: sorted(iterable)[:2]. > > I think you meant > > sorted(iterable, reverse=True)[:2]
:-) Raymond -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
