On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:50 PM, iu2 <isra...@elbit.co.il> wrote: > On Nov 3, 5:58 pm, Jonathan Hartley <tart...@tartley.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Recently I put together this incomplete comparison chart in an attempt >> to choose between the different alternatives to py2exe: >> >> http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tZ42hjaRunvkObFq0bKxVdg&output... >> >> Columns represent methods of deploying to end-users such that they >> don't have to worry about installing Python, packages or other >> dependencies. 'Bundle' represents manually bundling an interpreter >> with your app. 'Bootstrap' represents a fanciful idea of mine to >> include an installer that downloads and installs an interpreter if >> necessary. This sounds fiddly, since it would have to install side-by- >> side with any existing interpreters of the wrong version, without >> breaking anything. Has anyone done this? >> >> The remaining columns represent the projects out there I could find >> which would do the bundling for me. >> >> Are there major things I'm missing or misunderstanding? >> >> Perhaps folks on the list would care to rate (+1/-1) rows that they >> find important or unimportant, or suggest additional rows that would >> be important to them. Maybe an updated and complete version of this >> table would help people agree on what's important, and help the >> various projects to improve faster. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Jonathan > > Another thing that I think is of interest is whether the application > support modifying the version and description of the exe (that is, on > Windows, when you right-click on an application and choose > 'properties' you view the version number and description of the > application, it is a resource inside the exe). I think py2exe supports > it.
py2exe supports this, cx_freeze doesn't. - Max -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
