On 30 Jul 2009, at 19:42 , Carsten Haese wrote:
Well mostly because the other one doesn't exist (as python has `lst.reverse()` but `reversed(lst)`) but he was probably talking hypothetically. Or something.r wrote:Of course in python you would do... vector.reverse --> in-place vector.reversed --> in-placeYou do know that only one of those works in-place, right?
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list