In article <mailman.3843.1248793153.8015.python-l...@python.org>, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: >Aahz wrote: >> In article <mailman.3787.1248712420.8015.python-l...@python.org>, >> MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: >>> I've been working on a new implementation of the re module. The details >>> are at http://bugs.python.org/issue2636, specifically from >>> http://bugs.python.org/issue2636#msg90954. I've included a .pyd file for >>> Python 2.6 on Windows if you want to try it out. >> >> How does it handle the re module's unit tests? > >Basically, it passes all those tests I expect it to pass. :-) > >It fails those where the intended behaviour has changed, such as re.sub >treating unmatched groups as empty strings, as requested in >http://bugs.python.org/issue1519638.
Then you should definitely publish to PyPI and post a message to c.l.py.announce to get more users. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Many customs in this life persist because they ease friction and promote productivity as a result of universal agreement, and whether they are precisely the optimal choices is much less important." --Henry Spencer -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
