Aahz wrote:
In article <mailman.3787.1248712420.8015.python-l...@python.org>,
MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
I've been working on a new implementation of the re module. The details
are at http://bugs.python.org/issue2636, specifically from
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636#msg90954. I've included a .pyd file for
Python 2.6 on Windows if you want to try it out.
How does it handle the re module's unit tests?
Basically, it passes all those tests I expect it to pass. :-)
It fails those where the intended behaviour has changed, such as re.sub
treating unmatched groups as empty strings, as requested in
http://bugs.python.org/issue1519638.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
