Mitchell L Model wrote:
In Python 3, how should super() be used to invoke a method defined in C
> that overrides its two superclasses A and B, in particular __init__?
...
I've discovered the surprising fact described in the documentation of super
<http://docs.python.org/3.1/library/functions.html#super>
that specifying a class as the first argument of super means to skip that class
when
scanning the mro so that ....
This seems weird. Would someone please give a clear example and explanation of
the recommended way of initializing both superclasses in a simple multiple
inheritance
situation?
OK, in Diamond inheritance in Python (and all multi-inheritance is
diamond-shaped in Python), the common ancestor must have a method
in order to properly use super. The mro is guaranteed to have the
top of the split (C below) before its children in the mro, and the
join point (object or root below) after all of the classes from
which it inherits.
So, the correct way to do what you want:
class A:
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
print('A')
class B:
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
print('B')
class C(A, B):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
print('C')
C()
And, if you are doing it with a message not available in object:
class root:
def prints(self):
print('root') # or pass if you prefer
class A(root):
def prints(self):
super().prints()
print('A')
class B(root):
def prints(self):
super().prints()
print('B')
class C(A, B):
def prints(self):
super().prints()
print('C')
C().prints()
--Scott David Daniels
scott.dani...@acm.org
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
