Thankyou!
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Chris Rebert<c...@rebertia.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lawrence
> D'Oliveiro<l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
>> In message <mailman.2218.1246122370.8015.python-l...@python.org>, MRAB
>> wrote:
>>
>>> row = [r or "NULL" for r in row]
>>
>> I know that, in this particular case, all the elements of row are strings,
>> and the only string that is equivalent to False is the empty string, but
>> still
>>
>> row = [[r, "NULL"][r == ""] for r in row]
>
> While I do find the use of booleans as integers interesting, I think
> the ternary operator would be clearer:
>
> row = [("NULL" if r == "" else r) for r in row]
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
> --
> http://blog.rebertia.com
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
