On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Lawrence
D'Oliveiro<l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
> In message <mailman.2218.1246122370.8015.python-l...@python.org>, MRAB
> wrote:
>
>> row = [r or "NULL" for r in row]
>
> I know that, in this particular case, all the elements of row are strings,
> and the only string that is equivalent to False is the empty string, but
> still
>
> row = [[r, "NULL"][r == ""] for r in row]
While I do find the use of booleans as integers interesting, I think
the ternary operator would be clearer:
row = [("NULL" if r == "" else r) for r in row]
Cheers,
Chris
--
http://blog.rebertia.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
