In article <mailman.2139.1245994218.8015.python-l...@python.org>, Tom Reed <tomree...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Why no trees in the standard library, if not as a built in? I searched >the archive but couldn't find a relevant discussion. Seems like a >glaring omission considering the batteries included philosophy, >particularly balanced binary search trees. No interest, no good >implementations, something other reason? Seems like a good fit for the >collections module. Can anyone shed some light?
What do you want such a tree for? Why are dicts and the bisect module inadequate? Note that there are plenty of different tree implementations available from either PyPI or the Cookbook. -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "as long as we like the same operating system, things are cool." --piranha -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
