In message <692b7ae8-0c5b-498a- a012-51bda980f...@s28g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, namekuseijin wrote:
> On May 8, 6:48 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@geek- > central.gen.new_zealand> wrote: >> In message <gu269i$16i...@adenine.netfront.net>, namekuseijin wrote: >> >> > Carl Banks escreveu: >> >> >> 2. However, functional programming is cryptic at some level no matter >> >> how nice you make the syntax. >> >> > When your program is nothing but function definition and function >> > application, syntax is meaningless. >> >> On the contrary, syntax is vital to the correct interpretation of >> functional constructs. See, for example, >> <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2008-October/683816.html>. > > Yeah, it's important in an imperative language ... That was an example of functional programming. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
