Regarding feedback about
WHIFF -- WSGI/HTTP Integrated Filesystems Frames
On Apr 23, 3:43 pm, Aaron Watters <aaron.watt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 11:54 am, Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsdu...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > ....To sum it up, I think it's a neat idea, but it's not really intuitive.
> > After being quite startled at first it got better after I read the "why
> > it's cool" page.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to check it out and comment, Johannes.
> I think you bring up a very good point --
> some of directive names are confusing.
In retrospect the names were more than confusing. They were
simply awful. Thanks to Johannes, Drew and others I decided
to rename the directives:
"use-url" becomes "include",
"use-section" becomes "use",
"bind-section" becomes "reuse",
"bind-url" becomes "use-include",
"section" becomes "using",
"parameter" becomes "require"
These names are much less stupid (except for
use-include, but I couldn't come up with anything
better...).
Thanks Johannes and Drew! There is a new release
with the new directive names linked from
http://whiff.sourceforge.net
(What was I thinking?)
-- Aaron Watters
===
KIDS MAKE NUTRITIOUS SNACKS
(A real life newspaper headline)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
