Aaron Watters schrieb:
> This was posted just after someone on the same
> computer (somewhere in Texas)
> tried and failed to inject some javascript
> into the page using a comment.
Script-kid moron. Delete and enjoy your life.
> I don't see how this comment is helpful to
> me or anyone reading the page. How the
> framework confusing? Why should other readers dismiss
> the project? Can the documentation
> or implementation be
> improved, or is the whole thing beyond repair
> and if so how or why? Why do people bother
> to write comments like this one?
Humm... I just checked your framework out and must say that I, too,
found it a little confusing. Especially the meaning of "use-url" seems
awkward since obviously this means more like "use-middleware or
"use-plugin" or "use-module" or even just plain "use" (which would be
IMHO clearer).
When you say "use-url" I first though "Ok, this part of the document
will be shown when the user surfs at the supplied URL". Which is not
what it does.
I also do not understand what the difference between a section and a
use-url ist. It seems "section" just creates a new paragraph and
"use-url" invokes some plugin behaviour - but I'm not sure.
I'm not sure why you chose to use the {{ }} syntax, but I'm guessing
that when you'd have used XML it would be a pain to include manual HTML
formatting - again I am unsure.
To sum it up, I think it's a neat idea, but it's not really intuitive.
After being quite startled at first it got better after I read the "why
it's cool" page.
Kind regards,
Johannes
--
"Meine Gegenklage gegen dich lautet dann auf bewusste Verlogenheit,
verlästerung von Gott, Bibel und mir und bewusster Blasphemie."
-- Prophet und Visionär Hans Joss aka HJP in de.sci.physik
<48d8bf1d$0$7510$54022...@news.sunrise.ch>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
