On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:40:32 -0700 (PDT) bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote: > Paul McGuire: > > >xrange is not really intended for "in" testing,< > > Let's add the semantic of a good and fast "in" to xrange (and to the > range of Python3). It hurts no one, allows for a natural idiom > (especially when you have a stride you don't want to re-invent the > logic of skipping absent numbers), and it's readable.
A fast "in" to xrange would be great. Why was it taken away? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
