Paul McGuire: >xrange is not really intended for "in" testing,<
Let's add the semantic of a good and fast "in" to xrange (and to the range of Python3). It hurts no one, allows for a natural idiom (especially when you have a stride you don't want to re-invent the logic of skipping absent numbers), and it's readable. My xrange() I have written in D language has a fast OpIn_r() method. I haven't found any bad side effect to such capability yet. Bye, bearophile -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
