> On 4 Mar, 00:40, Peter Billam <pe...@www.pjb.com.au> wrote: >> http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/WxWidgets_Compared_To_Other_Toolkits >> seemed surprisingly even-handed.
On 2009-03-04, Paul Boddie <p...@boddie.org.uk> wrote: > I don't have a horse in this race, but apart from needing to > update that page based on recent developments (at least for Qt: a > licensing change which, being someone in favour of Free Software, Likewise... > I'm not particularly enthusiastic about), On http://www.riverbankcomputing.co.uk/software/pyqt/intro ... "PyQt does not include a copy of Qt. You must obtain a correctly licensed copy of Qt yourself." Does that refer to what you're refering to ? >> On 2009-03-03, Mike Driscoll <kyoso...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > It should be noted that the port for 3.0 hasn't started yet for >> > wxPython and I'm not seeing anything about a port for PyQt either >> > on their website. I mailed riverbankcomputing about PyQt for Py3; Phil Thompson replied > The next release of PyQt is planned for the end of this month. > It *might* make it to that release. which, *if* it happens, is not so far away. But that still leaves Gtk and Wx... > Take a look at this thread: > http://www.mail-archive.com/p...@riverbankcomputing.com/msg15072.html Good thread... > http://www.gtk.org/features.html Thank you... > http://www.qtsoftware.com/products/platform/qt-for-embedded-linux/ Likewise... > I don't think it's sensible to hang around waiting for Python 3 > library availability. You'd be better served using Python 2 straight > away and then considering moving to Python 3 when such libraries > finally become available. > Paul I might end up doing that, to get the feel of Qt v. Gtk v. Wx, but I'd be unproductive in that mode because my app needs a module I've just written in Py3, having bought Mark Summerfield's book. Thanks, Regards, Peter -- Peter Billam www.pjb.com.au www.pjb.com.au/comp/contact.html -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
