andrew cooke <andrew <at> acooke.org> writes: > > Hi, > > I have some 3.0 code, which I would like to make work with 2.6. > However, there does not seem to be support for the new super() (no > args) via __future__. Is that correct? If so, what's the best way to > handle this?
Just use the two argument super(): super(MyClass, instance) It's supported in both versions. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
