Russ P. wrote:
On Jan 21, 9:34 am, Luis Zarrabeitia <ky...@uh.cu> wrote:
But you keep failing to explay why do you need it to be _part of the standard_
library (or whatever).
Technically, it doesn't need to be. But if someone proposes using
particular language for a major safety-critical project, the critical
features realistically need to be part of the standard language or at
the very least in the standard library.
Python is not an appropriate language who make a fetish of the standard
library. Numpy, which descends from code developed at US gov labs and
agencies, and which would be essintial in many safety-critical projects
being discussed, is not part of it. And that had nothing to do with its
quality.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
