On Jan 20, 11:16 pm, alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this is the main issue we disagree on. I'm happier for Python > to remain lightweight where such features can be easily added on > demand through external libraries. I see no reason why a library > couldn't be as "well-engineered" a solution as an extension to the > interpreter, its use being a mandated (and enforced) requirement > within personal projects. The language just has to enable such > solutions, which I feel Python does well.
That could work. As long as it's well-engineered (not a hack), well- supported (part of the standard library), and does the job, that's probably all that matters. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
