Russ P. wrote: > On Jan 13, 11:40 pm, Steven D'Aprano > <ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au> wrote: > >> But, gosh darn it, wouldn't it be nice to program the critical parts of >> your code in "strict Python", and leave the rest as "trusting Python", >> instead of having to use Java for the lot just to get strictness in the >> critical parts? If only there was a way to do this, and ensure people >> won't abuse it. > > Yes, that would indeed be nice. I am certainly not the only one who > could use a language that is excellent for both research prototyping > *and* the final, safety-critical system. Then perhaps the prototype > could just be cleaned up and "hardened" for the end product rather > than rewritten in another language -- by programmers in another state > who may fail to understand many of the details that the prototype > developer agonized over.
You might have a look at Business Shell <http://www.pegasoft.ca/bush.html> which is based on Ada. Mel. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
