On Dec 29 2008, 9:34 am, John Machin <sjmac...@lexicon.net> wrote: > On Dec 29, 5:01 pm, scsoce <scs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I have a function return a reference, > > Stop right there. You don't have (and can't have, in Python) a > function which returns a reference that acts like a pointer in C or C+ > +. Please tell us what manual, tutorial, book, blog or Usenet posting > gave you that idea, and we'll get the SWAT team sent out straight > away. > > > and want to assign to the > > reference, simply like this: > > >>def f(a) > > return a > > That's not a very useful function, even after you fix the syntax error > in the def statement. Would you care to give us a more realistic > example of what you are trying to achieve? > > > b = 0 > > * f( b ) = 1* > > Is the * at the start of the line meant to indicate pointer > dereferencing like in C? If not, what is it? Why is there a * at the > end of the line? > > > but the last line will be refused as "can't assign to function call". > > In my thought , the assignment is very nature, > > Natural?? Please tell us why you would want to do that instead of: > > b = 1 > > > but why the interpreter > > refused to do that ? > > Because (the BDFL be praised!) it (was not, is not, will not be) in > the language grammar.
Although not being able to do the following has on occasion annoyed me: f(x) += 1 If the object returned by f(x) supports in place operations then it is an entirely logical meaning, but not the interpreter can't know ahead of time whether that is the case or not. Michael Foord -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
