News123 a écrit :
Lie wrote:
On Dec 7, 1:02 am, News123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What would be interesting would be some syntactical sugar to get rid of
the 'self' (at least in the code body).
This has been debated to hell and back. And it's *not* going to happen.
example:
class C:
class_elements a,b,c,d
def method(self,arg):
global d
a,b,c = arg[0..3]
d = a + b
self.e = a + d
Nah, that would make it not explicit. Explicit here also means that to
refer to self's a, we need to explicitly refer to self.
Well being explicit when trying to suggest an implicit syntax (in order
to reduce typing) is a little difficult ;-)
Though you're right my main goal is not being implicit but would be
reducing typing and have shorter source code lines.
then use 's' instead of 'self'.
If 'global '<varname>' is accepted inside a def, then moving
'class_elements <varnames>' inside the def could be acceptable as well
self.x is an instance attribute, not a class attribute. Aslo, the def
statement creates a function, not a method, so the notion of
"class_element" or however you name it is totally irrelevant here.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
