Lie wrote: > On Dec 7, 1:02 am, News123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What would be interesting would be some syntactical sugar to get rid of >> the 'self' (at least in the code body). >> >> example: >> class C: >> class_elements a,b,c,d >> >> def method(self,arg): >> global d >> a,b,c = arg[0..3] >> d = a + b >> self.e = a + d >> > > Nah, that would make it not explicit. Explicit here also means that to > refer to self's a, we need to explicitly refer to self.
Well being explicit when trying to suggest an implicit syntax (in order to reduce typing) is a little difficult ;-) Though you're right my main goal is not being implicit but would be reducing typing and have shorter source code lines. If 'global '<varname>' is accepted inside a def, then moving 'class_elements <varnames>' inside the def could be acceptable as well though it would requiere, that this statement is repeated per def bye N -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
