In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bertilo Wennergren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The main reason I waited until Python 3000 came out is the new way >Unicode is handled. The old way seemed really broken to me. Much of >what I do when I program consists of juggling Unicode text (real >Unicode text with lots of actual characters outside of Latin 1). So in >my case learning version 2.x first might not be very convenient. I'd >just get bogged down with the strange way 2.x handles such data. I'd >rather skip that completely and just go with the Unicode handling in >3.0.
Sounds like you have a good use-case for 3.0 -- go to it! -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code." --Bill Harlan -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
