Tim Rowe a écrit :
2008/9/26 Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Not to start a troll, but from what I've seen of C# so far I do find this a
bit surprising and really suspect more of a library issue than a language
one. Care to tell more about the problem and solution ?
(NB : I wouldn't even asked if you had mentionned say Erlang or Prolog or
OCaml - well, some mostly different language - instead of C#)
IIRC it was library issues -- for one thing I still find it a lot
harder to manage an MS Windows GUI under Python than I do under .NET
(I've never succeeded in getting Iron Python to run properly). In one
sense you could argue that that's not a language issue, and you'd be
right: there's nothing in the syntax or semantics of either language
that makes it so. But in another sense I'd say it is a language issue
(and of course I think I'm right!)
And - after reading the following argument - I think you're wrong !-)
because Python aims to be platform
independent, and whilst that means gains in portability it means that
in return it loses the ease-of-programming of a tightly integrated
platform.
Still a library issue. Python doesn't defines "platform-independant" the
way Java does, and there are quite a couple Python packages (third-part
or even in the standard lib) that are clearly platform-specific -
including MS Windows COM stuff, which was a major PITA using VB6.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
