2008/9/27 Aaron Castironpi Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No way. It's *zero* instead of one, if so, because the only thing C# > has is a bunch of handcuffs and implicit 'self'. You have a line > like:
You don't follow what I said, and from your tone I get the feeling you don't *want* to follow what I'm saying, not because I'm criticising Python (I'm not), but because I'm guilty of the heresy of suggesting that it's not actually simultaneoulsy optimised for every possible use. My point is that there are zero parameters as far as I am concerned because I don't actually touch most of the GUI code. There could actually be hundreds of parameters, for all I care. They're not my concern. Most of the time I like that -- the tools are doing my work for me. -- Tim Rowe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
