On Jul 30, 11:07 am, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carl Banks wrote: > > That's not what I was asking for. I was asking for a use case for "if > > x" that can't be replaced by a simple explicit test. Your example > > didn't satisfy that. > > But I believe my example of an iterator with __bool__ but not with > __len__ does.
And I believe I followed up to your post saying as much. :) Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
