Carl Banks wrote:
That's not what I was asking for. I was asking for a use case for "if x" that can't be replaced by a simple explicit test. Your example didn't satisfy that.
It's a completely artificial request. "if x" _is_ a completely simple test. Simpler, in fact, than the ones you were advocating.
-- Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis An ounce of hypocrisy is worth a pound of ambition. -- Michael Korda -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
