Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nikolaus Rath a écrit :
>> Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (snip)
>
>>> In short, unlike what most of the implicit self advocates are
>>> saying, it's not just a simple change to the python parser to do
>>> this. It would require a change in the interpreter itself and how it
>>> deals with classes.
>>
>>
>> Thats true. But out of curiosity: why is changing the interpreter such
>> a bad thing? (If we suppose for now that the change itself is a good
>> idea).
>
> Because it would very seriously break a *lot* of code ?
Well, Python 3 will break lots of code anyway, won't it?
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
»It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority.
By definition, there are already enough people to do that.«
-J.H. Hardy
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
