On Jul 24, 8:01 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED] central.gen.new_zealand> wrote: > In message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jordan > wrote: > > > Except when it comes to Classes. I added some classes to code that had > > previously just been functions, and you know what I did - or rather, > > forgot to do? Put in the 'self'. In front of some of the variable > > accesses, but more noticably, at the start of *every single method > > argument list.* > > The reason is quite simple. Python is not truly an "object-oriented" > language. It's sufficiently close to fool those accustomed to OO ways of > doing things, but it doesn't force you to do things that way. You still > have the choice. An implicit "self" would take away that choice.
You could still explicitly request non-implicit self on a method by method basis. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
