On Jul 21, 12:56 am, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 19, 12:20 am, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jul 19, 8:05 am, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > for more information. But I'm guessing that you're > > > questioning the fact that a value that's apparently > > > *less* than 3499.35 is rounded up to 3499.4, rather > > > than down to 3499.3. ? > > > "apparently" being the operative word. > > Well, it's not just an apparent problem: the closest > floating-point number to 3499.35 really *is* less than > 3499.35.
I'm well aware of that. My point is that I hope that you weren't planning on changing that behaviour in an unannounced unstaged manner. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
