I came across the "japh" concept today and decided to do one of my own, obviously, interpreting the 'p' somewhat loosely,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JAPH but I'm not entirely satisfied with it: #### # japh, for certain values of 'p' f=lambda(r,N):N and f((" acdefijlmnopqrstuv"[N%19]+r,N/19))or(r,N) print f( ("",reduce(lambda c,m:c*95+''.join(map(chr,range(32,127))).index(m), "!b)'1Mgh0z+fYQ]g::i^<&y~g)cnE-d=K&{GMNQ1gx+ooY<~L##N'X]P2<@XYXwX3z", 0)))[0] #### it bothers me that there are two statements. (In case you are wondering what they do, it's all essentially about changing from base 95 to base 19. It's based loosely on this fine, simple recipe by Drew Perttula which I have found to be useful on several occasions: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/111286 ) Anyway, I'd much prefer an even uglier japh like this: # does not work print (lambda(r,N):N and $$$$((" acdefijlmnopqrstuv"[N%19]+r,N/ 19))or(r,N))( ("",reduce(lambda c,m:c*95+''.join(map(chr,range(32,127))).index(m), "!b)'1Mgh0z+fYQ]g::i^<&y~g)cnE-d=K&{GMNQ1gx+ooY<~L##N'X]P2<@XYXwX3z", 0)))[0] but what would $$$$ be for an unnamed function to call itself? I realize that lambda is something of an orphan and was arguably a bad idea for anything besides obfuscation, but obfuscation is exactly my purpose here. Can a lambda call itself without giving itself a name? Google was not my friend on this one, and I suspect there is no answer. Relax, I am not going to submit a PEP about it. mt -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
