"Eduardo O. Padoan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've got Python 3.0 alpha 2. In this version, it looks like you can >> define classes in either the old style or new style. (I snipped the >> top line a bit in the following example): > > Wrong. Py3k Classes are always new-style. They subclass object > implicitly when no superclass is given.
I think he was talking about syntax, not object types. -- Arnaud -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
