On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got Python 3.0 alpha 2. In this version, it looks like you can > define classes in either the old style or new style. (I snipped the > top line a bit in the following example):
Wrong. Py3k Classes are always new-style. They subclass object implicitly when no superclass is given. > Python 3.0a2 (r30a2:59405M, Dec 7 2007, 15:23:28 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" >>>> class one(object): pass > ... >>>> class two: pass > ... >>>> two > <class '__main__.two'> >>>> one > <class '__main__.one'> >>>> type(one) > <type 'type'> >>>> type(two) > <type 'type'> >>>> Both classes are new style. -- Eduardo de Oliveira Padoan http://www.advogato.org/person/eopadoan/ http://twitter.com/edcrypt Bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/edcrypt -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
