>> Does anyone have a pure python implementation of the builtin 'set' >> object so that I could use that in python 2.3? > > Yes. You have one in Python 2.3 already > <URL:http://www.python.org/doc/2.3.5/lib/module-sets.html>, it's just > not a builtin. > >> If this would be the case that would be really great as I wouldn't >> have to change my code that runs happily on 2.5 > > You will, but it's as simple as: > > try: > set() > except NameError: > from sets import Set as set > > You then know that 'set' refers to the set type from that point on (or > you're not on a version of Python that has a 'set' type at all).
Thanks Ben! I should have checked the docs........ Cheers, Daniel -- Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
