"Daniel Fetchinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone have a pure python implementation of the builtin 'set' > object so that I could use that in python 2.3?
Yes. You have one in Python 2.3 already <URL:http://www.python.org/doc/2.3.5/lib/module-sets.html>, it's just not a builtin. > If this would be the case that would be really great as I wouldn't > have to change my code that runs happily on 2.5 You will, but it's as simple as: try: set() except NameError: from sets import Set as set You then know that 'set' refers to the set type from that point on (or you're not on a version of Python that has a 'set' type at all). -- \ "I have a large seashell collection, which I keep scattered on | `\ the beaches all over the world. Maybe you've seen it." -- | _o__) Steven Wright | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
