[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing is, is there is another natural meaning to [a,b:c].
Counting grids on the diagonals, the rational set is well defined:
0: 0, 0
1: 1, 0
2: 0, 1
3: 2, 0
4: 1, 1
5: 0, 2
6: 3, 0
7: 2, 1
...
Thencefore ( 2, 0 ) : ( 3, 0 ) is well defined. Thencefore,
a,b:c,d
is not; x[a,b:c,d]= x[a]+ x[b:c]+ x[d].
I'm not sure what you mean here. Could you give me a simple piece of code to
show an example ?
Yves.
http://www.SollerS.ca
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
