2008/4/5, Aldo Cortesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thus spake Matthieu Brucher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > How does it compare to the nose framework ? > > > As far as the base unit testing functionality is concerned, I think > they try to address similar problems. Both have assert-based testing > with inspection and re-parsing of assert exceptions for better error > messages. Both try to provide better fixture management. Both make > programmatic test generation easier. Both have a command-line tool for > running and gathering tests. > > I like nose, but I'm biased, and of course I think Pry has some > advantages. One difference I'd point out is Pry's tree-based test > structure, which provides a number of conveniences and features (much > nicer test selection from the command line, for instance). Pry is also > less than half the size of nose, and should therefore be simpler to > extend and understand. > > At any rate, feel free to take a look at Pry and see what you think. >
One last question : does it take doctests into account ? Thanks for the last answer ;) Matthieu -- French PhD student Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/ Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
