On Mar 25, 11:03 am, Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any good genetic algorithms involving you-split, i-pick? > > I've always heard it as "you divide, I decide"... > > That said, I'm not sure how that applies in a GA world. It's > been a while since I've done any coding with GAs, but I don't > recall any facets related to the You Divide, I Decide problem. > It sounds like a simple optimization of "equality", which would > be a normal use of a GA. This would apply for both the division > and the decision, depending on which side the GA is (the "you" or > the "I") or two diff. GAs can be on either side of the process. > > -tkc
Tim, if you have any interest in the stuff: You Divide I Decide YDID only works where resources are highly divisible: Except if, do livelock or deadlock occur in real time? If I get in line for going to bars, I enter a decreased-expressivity (- outlet) state, open up, close, and come sit down. Now, what do I generally yield? A life's story. I think I 'send' a request for details in the form of a repetition, except it takes into account a lot of computation, spef. my understading. I also think I look for a 'random' generator to call 'send' on, but that could just be prioritized by strength of pole, but here's the important part, -at- - the- -time-. Taking priority graph/queue to be a function of the past, you can classify into spatial pole and cumulative pole; just the sense mechanata 'say where': 'we favor X' progressively over time. Back at the fork in the road, I was favoring a turn, not a path. I can make a dual, and for the sake of discussion, entertain I do. Are you a musician? Is Heaven a noninterest market? Electricity is a uniform current, highly potent (can sterilize+neutralize), highly uniform (verb regulize). I don't like "discovering poles" "once on the road (just to where)"; I think they're a net quality of life decrease; I don't like poles; they make one answer, heavy questions. Computers at least, can't come and answer; hypothetically, analytically, their pulls can't either. (Computers and their pulls, doh.) However, if I create pole by my actions, they're only part to blame (yes, instead of entirely either or not). Except but, how do I get home? I don't get random homes, it's the same one. Neither does my home pull random people (is it a pole to). It's weird: you can bury latent poles, though clearly time isn't the fuse-length. Contingently exclusive (upon?). There's a layer of discouragement for everything and around everyone else's; surprising me at home is repulsive, lightly. Eating is attractive, more and less over time, sometimes crucial (oddly enough); it creates a junction by outweighing discouragement. (My kitchen is extremely unattractive but not repulsive at all, any farther than the newcome stir, which will come with me after that, though the process of dissipation is a little mysterious-- LaPlace?) There's no good framework for composing (draw analogy to, analogee) the process of emancipation (w.c.) and dissipation, so I lean to church, even though it's chalk-full of non- mathematical (non-vicarous) remarks: "We come, and the vicar leaves. He's just of no interest." Interest might be mutual too, but only in magnitude. I don't like attraction wars. Can I get a tongue regressed (cf. kitchen sink regression)? Are we in Economics? There's money in it. I have to go speak French. Je dois aller. http://www.westga.edu/~jhasbun/osp/Fourier.htm If you receive a sign, do you just design it? What if you have a more clever way to spell a word, qua composite sign? What if you spell it the old way? Consign, design, ensign, and resign. The English tongue is really 'pulling forward' quite fast. Time is generational in facet. (Is a phoneme a particle? Phones are not.) I think time means 'generation', which you can do across space. Ears receive 1-D parametric impressions, Eyes receive 2-D. I don't know of much work in deparametrization, but method iteration ( f_i= f( f_(i-1) ) ), representing space as time, creates generations of something. Problem is, iterations are chosen by somebody, what function to call next in time, so there is a lot of money in choosing functions to call in order, es. if it's refining parameters to other functions. Feedback on computers is lightning-fast, bringing billion- baud guess-and-checking to hands. If you were a tuple, what tuple would you be? Encode, hash, and echo? Do you GOTO home or GOSUB home? What if you limited call stack depth to like five? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
