Gregor Horvath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
> >>>type(['1'])
><type 'list'>
>
> >>>type(('1'))
><type 'str'>
>
>I wonder why ('1') is no tuple????
You need to say ('1',). In just plain ('1'), the parens are
interpreted as grouping, not as tuple creation. Depending on your
point of view, this is either a "special case", or an "ugly wart" in
the syntax.
a = () # tuple of zero elements
a = (1,) # tuple of one element
a = 1, # tuple of one element
a = (1) # scalar
a = (1, 2) # tuple of two elements
a = 1, 2 # tuple of two elements
a = , # syntax error
The big question is, is it the parens that make it a tuple, or is it
the comma? If you go along with the parens school of thought, then
(1,) is the special case. If you believe in commas, then the () is
the special case. In either case, it's a bit ugly, but we learn to
overlook the occasional cosmetic blemishes of those we love :-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
