On 2008-02-19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to start marking my subjective comments with a star,
> so it's clear what is emperically verifiable, and what is not.
>
> It's a bad sign.
I've no idea what "it" refers to in the sentence above.
> If you aren't keeping your thoughts to yourself, and thrashing
> about the world for a peer, a social network, a support group,
> or a community, then you missed the day in grammar school when
> they were handing out smiles. But they're not handing them
> out anymore.
To me, that appears to be a completely random homile, appropos
of nothing. Even as a homily, it doesn't really make any
sense.
> Even on my emperical claims, I'm wrong 90% of the time. On
> the subjective ones, I'm not only wrong that much, but no one
> else want to hear, or even can verify them. Smell's fine to
> me.
>
> Emotions are prejudiced; and even in my own concrete thoughts,
> I will misidentify myself with another, and others with me.
> When I say "I", I mean "you."
I've no idea what your point is. I guess you're trying to
explain why your posts appear to be semi-random nonsense?
> French and Spanish have impersonal pronouns: "on" and "se",
> respectively. In English, they often come out as, "we",
> "they", and "you" a lot, on occasion a "one", and sometimes,
> even, I.
Perhaps you need somebody who's fluent in English to help you
proofread your posts? Or help you tune the Eliza program
you're using to generate them?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm encased in the
at lining of a pure pork
visi.com sausage!!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
