On Feb 13, 12:53 pm, Carsten Haese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 10:40 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But why doesn't it work when you make that change? > > I can't answer that question, because it *does* work when you make that > change.
Well, the OP said the function was returning None which meant no match which implies None means composite for the given example 2. If None was supposed to mean prime, then why would returing None for 2 be a problem? But isn't this kind of silly? ## 3 None ## 4 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 5 None ## 6 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 7 None ## 8 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 9 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 10 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 11 None ## 12 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 13 None ## 14 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 15 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 16 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 17 None ## 18 <_sre.SRE_Match object at 0x011761A0> ## 19 None > > -- > Carsten Haesehttp://informixdb.sourceforge.net -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
