On Feb 3, 2:03 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ruby has a neat little convenience when writing loops where you don't > care about the loop index: you just do n.times do { ... some > code ... } where n is an integer representing how many times you want > to execute "some code." > > In Python, the direct translation of this is a for loop. When the > index doesn't matter to me, I tend to write it as: > > for _ in xrange (1,n): > some code [...]
If 'some code' is a function (say f) you can write (with repeat from itertools): for action in repeat(f, n): action() I don't know how 'Pythonic' this would be... -- Arnaud -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list