Robert Kern wrote: > David C. Ullrich wrote: >> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:56:21 -0600, Robert Kern >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> David C. Ullrich wrote: >>>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:09:25 -0500, Robert Kern >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> David C. Ullrich wrote: >>>>>> [???] >>>>> Okay, which version of OS X do you have? In 10.3 and 10.4 it used to be >>>>> here: >>>>> /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.3/lib/python2.3/plat-mac/CoreGraphics.py >>>>> >>>>> I notice that in 10.5, it no longer exists, though. >>>> Um, surely that doesn't mean that there's no CoreGraphics >>>> available in 10.5? >>> The CoreGraphics C library still exists, of course. The Python module they >>> provided does not. >> Right - I was referring to the Python module. >> >> Why would they do such a thing? (Never mind, I don't >> imagine you know.) > > Apple was using it in their fax software. I'm not sure they ever intended it > to > be used by people external to Apple, though.
Could be, > They certainly never documented it. cuz most of the stuff they include _is_ much better (ie at least somewhat) documented. Very sad. > I imagine they are no longer using it in their fax software. > >> Hmm, I saw somewhere the other day that PyObjC comes with 10.5. >> Maybe that means there's no longer any point to a separate >> CoreGraphics.py? > > No, they're different things. PyObjC does wrap a Cocoa drawing API, but that > API > does not cover nearly as much of the CoreGraphics API as CoreGraphics.py did. > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
