Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Without throwing away 500 items: > > def sortt(d): > sorted_items = sorted(d.iteritems(), > key=operator.itemgetter(1), > reverse=True) > return map(operator.itemgetter(0), sorted_items)
Isn't that just equivalent to:
def sortt(d):
return sorted(d.iterkeys(), key=d.__getitem__,
reverse=True)
which has the advantage of not building a list of tuples just to throw it
away?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
